View source for Electric Technocracy Definition

{{Subtitle|Reimagining Governance for the Age of Intelligent Networks}}

Proposed model of expert-based governance using AI advisory systems and global direct digital voting outside conventional political structures.

{| class="infobox" style="width:320px; background:#f5f5f5; border:1px solid #aaa; font-size:90%; line-height:1.4;"
|-
! colspan="2" style="text-align:center; background:#e0e0e0; font-size:115%; padding:6px;" | Electric Technocracy
|-
| colspan="2" style="text-align:center; padding:6px;" |
[[File:Flag_of_Electric_Technocracy.jpg|220px|Flag of Electric Technocracy]]
<br /><small>Symbolic flag representing the concept of Electric Technocracy</small>
|-
| style="padding:4px; font-weight:bold;" | Type
| style="padding:4px;" | Proposed governance model
|-
| style="padding:4px; font-weight:bold;" | Formulated by
| style="padding:4px;" | R. Goeritz
|-
| style="padding:4px; font-weight:bold;" | Development period
| style="padding:4px;" | 1998–2024
|-
| style="padding:4px; font-weight:bold;" | Purpose
| style="padding:4px;" | Integration of technological advancements into governance
|-
| style="padding:4px; font-weight:bold;" | Characteristics
| style="padding:4px;" | Open, science‑oriented, adaptable framework
|}

== Electric Technocracy ==

'''Electric Technocracy''' is a proposed political and socio-technical model of global self-governance that combines [[wikipedia:Technocracy|technocratic governance]], [[wikipedia:Artificial intelligence|Artificial intelligence]] (AI), [[wikipedia:Artificial superintelligence|Artificial superintelligence]] (ASI), [[wikipedia:Cybernetics|Cybernetics]], [[wikipedia:Automation|Automation]], and [[wikipedia:Direct democracy|direct digital democracy]] (DDD) within a globally networked digital infrastructure.<ref>[https://archive.org/details/electric-technocracy ''Electric Technocracy – A New Form of Government (Original Concept)''] at Internet Archive, 21 March 2025</ref> Proponents describe the framework as a post-national system intended as an alternative or successor model to existing nation-state governance structures, representative political systems, political parties, and centralized ruling structures with continuous democratic participation by the global population through digital platforms.

The Electric Technocracy is modeled on principles of open‑source software development. It is openly accessible, not subject to exclusive ownership, and designed for continuous adaptation, collaborative improvement, and ongoing evolution.

Within the framework, individuals are proposed to directly submit political proposals, deliberate on public policy, and vote on administrative decisions without elected intermediaries or permanent governing elites. ASI functions as an analytical and administrative infrastructure rather than a sovereign authority, processing large-scale economic, legal, ecological, and infrastructural data to identify societal problems, generate policy proposals, simulate outcomes, and coordinate automated governance systems for democratic evaluation and voting.<ref>[https://www.brookings.edu/books/wiki-government/ ''Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful''] by Beth Simone Noveck, Brookings Institution Press, 2009, pages 1–12, ISBN 978-0815702757</ref><ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.08055 ''AI Governance: A Research Agenda''] by Allan Dafoe, 2018, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.1812.08055</ref>

Electric Technocracy is situated within broader discussions concerning [[wikipedia:Algorithmic governance|Algorithmic governance]], [[wikipedia:Digital democracy|Digital democracy]], AI-assisted public administration, and cybernetic governance systems.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0282-3 ''The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation''] by John Danaher, Philosophy & Technology, volume 30, issue 3, 2017, pages 245–268</ref><ref>''Brain of the Firm'' by Stafford Beer, Allen Lane, 1972, pages 83–112, ISBN 978-0713902198</ref> Proponents argue that ASI-assisted governance could reduce corruption, bureaucratic inefficiency, ideological polarization, favoritism, prejudice, and short-term political decision-making through machine-based rational optimization and large-scale computational analysis. Advanced AI systems are further proposed to coordinate both planetary-scale infrastructure and regional administrative systems, including the generation of localized democratic policy proposals for geographically remote or underserved populations.<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12642 ''Democratising AI: Multiple Meanings, Goals, and Methods''] by Elizabeth Seger et al., 2023, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2303.12642</ref>

== Overview ==

Electric Technocracy is presented by its proponents as a governance model combining AI-assisted administration with systems of direct digital participation.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 ''Electric Technocracy: A World Beyond Borders and Politics – Global Governance in the Age of Intelligent Machines''] by Oliver Markus Reff, 2025</ref> The concept argues that automation, technological progress, and global digital interconnectivity are transforming political and economic systems and may require new forms of governance.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18073084 ''The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now''] by Yalcin Veddat Durkac, 2026</ref>

The framework proposes governance through real-time information systems, automated coordination, predictive analytics, and globally networked digital institutions.<ref name="Dafoe2018">[https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.08055 ''AI Governance: A Research Agenda''] by Allan Dafoe, 2018, arXiv:1812.08055</ref> Within the model, artificial superintelligence (ASI) is described as analytical infrastructure rather than an autonomous ruler, while political legitimacy is proposed to remain with human participants through systems of direct digital democracy.<ref>''Wiki government: how technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful'' by Beth Simone Noveck, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 2009, ISBN 978-0-8157-0275-7</ref>

The concept has been associated with [[wikipedia:Cybernetics|Cybernetics]], [[wikipedia:Algorithmic governance|Algorithmic governance]], [[wikipedia:AI governance|AI governance]], [[wikipedia:Transhumanism|Transhumanism]], and [[wikipedia:Post-scarcity economy|post-scarcity economic]] theories.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0282-3 ''The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation''] by John Danaher, Michael J. Hogan, and Chris Noone, Philosophy & Technology, volume 30, issue 3, 2017, pages 245–268</ref><ref>[https://doi.org/10.1353/jct.2005.0021 ''A History of Transhumanist Thought''] by Nick Bostrom, Journal of Evolution and Technology, volume 14, issue 1, 2005</ref>

Supporting literature connected to the framework discusses post-scarcity economics, automation, basic income, AI-assisted economic planning, and taxation systems adapted to automated economies.<ref>''Post-scarcity anarchism'' by Murray Bookchin, Black Rose Books, Montréal, 1977, edition 2, ISBN 978-0-920057-41-4</ref><ref>''Rise of the robots: technology and the threat of a jobless future'' by Martin Ford, Basic Books, New York, 2016, ISBN 978-0-465-09753-1</ref><ref>''Basic income: a radical proposal for a free society and a sane economy'' by Philippe van Parijs and Yannick Vanderborght, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2017, ISBN 978-0-674-05228-4</ref><ref>[https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3183860 ''Basic Income in the Automation Age''], SSRN Electronic Journal, 2018</ref><ref>''On Robot Revolution and Taxation'' by Tshilidzi Marwala, Semantic Scholar (Preprint), 2018</ref><ref>[https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5010-7 ''Economic Modeling Using Artificial Intelligence Methods''] by Tshilidzi Marwala, Springer, 2013, ISBN 978-1-4471-5009-1</ref><ref>[https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100524000173 ''Optimal Taxes and Basic Income During an Episode of Automation: A Workers' Perspective''] by Manoj Atolia, Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2024</ref><ref>''The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism'' by Jeremy Rifkin, St. Martin's Press, 2014, ISBN 9781137278463</ref><ref>''PostCapitalism: A Guide to Our Future'' by Paul Mason, Allen Lane, 2015, ISBN 9781846147388</ref>

== History ==

=== Origins of technocracy ===

The term ''technocracy'' derives from the Greek (''tekhne'', “skill”) and (''kratos'', “rule” or “power”). Engineer William Henry Smyth is generally credited with popularizing the term in 1919.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20041230024203/http://www.technocracy.org/periodicals/nwtechnocrat/237/who-is-a-technocrat.html ''Who Is A Technocrat?''] at Technocracy Inc., 2001-03-11</ref>

During the 1930s, technocratic ideas gained prominence through [[wikipedia:Howard Scott (engineer)|Howard Scott]] and the [[wikipedia:technocracy movement|technocracy movement]] in North America, which advocated scientific management, energy accounting, and technical administration instead of price-based economics.

=== Technical Alliance and Technocracy Inc. ===

The '''Technical Alliance''', founded in 1918 by [[wikipedia:Howard Scott (engineer)|Howard Scott]], was among the earliest organized technocratic groups. Economist [[wikipedia:Thorstein Veblen|Thorstein Veblen]] promoted related ideas in ''The Engineers and the Price System'' (1921), arguing that industrial production was constrained more by financial systems than by technical capacity.

During the [[wikipedia:Great Depression|Great Depression]], technocratic theories gained wider public attention through '''Technocracy Inc.''', which proposed that industrial society could be coordinated more efficiently through engineering, scientific planning, and technical expertise rather than conventional political structures.

=== Cybernetics and digital governance ===

The development of [[wikipedia:Cybernetics|Cybernetics]] and systems theory influenced later theories of algorithmic governance, digital administration, and AI-assisted public management.<ref>''Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine'' by Norbert Wiener, MIT Press, 1948, ISBN 9780262730095</ref><ref>[https://books.google.com/books/about/Brain_of_the_Firm.html?id=bVK3AAAAIAAJ ''Brain of the Firm: The Managerial Cybernetics of Organization''] by Stafford Beer, John Wiley & Sons, 1981, pages 1–25, ISBN 9780471276876</ref>

Cybernetic theory viewed societies and organizations as feedback systems coordinated through information flows and real-time data processing. Later developments in computer networks, the internet, [[wikipedia:Digital democracy|Digital democracy]], blockchain-based voting, digital identity systems, and AI-assisted administration contributed to broader discussions surrounding [[wikipedia:Algorithmic governance|Algorithmic governance]] and technologically mediated democratic systems.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0282-3 ''The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation''] by John Danaher, Philosophy & Technology, volume 30, issue 3, 2017, pages 245–268</ref><ref>[https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0252-1 ''Liquid Democracy: Potentials, Problems, and Perspectives''] by Christian Blum and Christina Isabel Zuber, Public Choice, volume 162, issue 1–2, 2015, pages 167–194</ref>

=== Universal basic income ===

[[wikipedia:Universal basic income|Universal basic income]] (UBI) has a long intellectual history. Early forms appeared in antiquity, including grain distributions in ancient Rome. In the 16th century, [[wikipedia:Thomas More|Thomas More]] proposed guaranteed income systems to reduce poverty and crime, while later thinkers such as [[wikipedia:Thomas Paine|Thomas Paine]], [[wikipedia:Henry George|Henry George]], and [[wikipedia:Milton Friedman|Milton Friedman]] developed related economic concepts.

Modern UBI debates increasingly intersect with discussions surrounding [[wikipedia:Automation|Automation]], artificial intelligence, and post-scarcity economics. Contemporary proposals have explored funding mechanisms based on automated production, robotics, and machine-generated economic output rather than taxation primarily derived from human labor.<ref>''Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future'' by Martin Ford, Basic Books, 2016, pages 263–289, ISBN 9780465097531</ref><ref>[https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674052284 ''Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy''] by Philippe Van Parijs and Yannick Vanderborght, Harvard University Press, 2017, pages 101–145, ISBN 9780674052284</ref><ref>[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.11.002 ''AI Taxation as an Economic Stabilizer in Automation-driven Markets''] by Hassan A. Abbass et al., Economic Modelling, volume 115, 2023, page 105966</ref>

The emergence of AI governance research, cybernetic administration, and automation-driven economic theories contributed to later concepts such as Electric Technocracy, which combines elements of [[wikipedia:Technocracy|Technocracy]], [[wikipedia:Artificial superintelligence|Artificial superintelligence]], [[wikipedia:Direct democracy|direct digital democracy]], and automation-based economics within a globally networked governance framework.

== Terminology ==

=== Electric ===

Within the framework, the term electric refers to the emergence of an electronically interconnected civilization based on the [[wikipedia:Internet|Internet]], artificial intelligence, digital networks, and real-time global communication.

According to proponents, the concept describes the transition from industrial and analog society toward an electronic age in which administration, communication, economic coordination, and democratic participation can occur directly through digital systems without traditional intermediaries. The framework argues that internet technologies and AI systems reduce dependence on political parties, centralized elites, and representative power structures by enabling direct online participation and globally networked decision-making.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0282-3 ''The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation''] by John Danaher and Michael J. Hogan, Philosophy & Technology, volume 30, issue 3, 2017, pages 245–268</ref>

Proponents compare this transformation to cryptocurrencies and blockchain systems, which were designed to enable peer-to-peer financial interaction without traditional banking intermediaries. In a similar way, Electric Technocracy proposes that systems of direct digital democracy (DDD) could allow individuals to submit proposals, debate policies, and vote directly through online infrastructure.

Within the framework, the term also includes AI-assisted administration, automated coordination systems, digital identity infrastructure, predictive analytics, and globally networked governance platforms designed for increasingly complex technological societies.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1812.08055 ''AI Governance: A Research Agenda''] by Allan Dafoe, 2018</ref>

=== Technocracy ===

The term ''technocracy'' refers to governance systems emphasizing technical expertise, scientific management, and systems engineering over traditional party politics.<ref>''Technocracy and the American Dream: The Technocrat Movement, 1900–1941'' by William E. Akin, University of California Press, 1977, page 3, ISBN 978-0520031104</ref><ref>[https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-74101-2_9 ''Planning the Technate: The Apolitical Politics of the 1930s’ Technocratic Movement in North America and Europe''] by Eva Visser, in ''Depoliticisation before Neoliberalism'', edited by Adriejan van Veen and Theo Jung, Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025, pages 201–227, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-74101-2_9, ISBN 978-3-031-74100-5</ref>

Electric Technocracy reinterprets this concept through the integration of artificial superintelligence (ASI) and advanced AI systems as analytical and logistical infrastructure. Within the framework, ASI is not described as a sovereign ruler, but as a global advisory system intended to generate highly advanced proposals, simulations, and solutions across scientific, legal, economic, ecological, and social domains.

Proponents argue that ASI systems could theoretically achieve analytical capabilities exceeding those of human experts in multiple domains.<ref>''Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies'' by Nick Bostrom, Oxford University Press, 2014, pages 22–29, ISBN 978-0199678112</ref> The framework argues that such systems should not replace human sovereignty or serve narrow elite interests, but instead provide optimized policy options for public evaluation through systems of direct digital democracy (DDD). Final legitimacy and decision-making authority are proposed to remain with human participants through collective online voting.<ref>[https://www.brookings.edu/books/wiki-government/ ''Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful''] by Beth Simone Noveck, Brookings Institution Press, 2009, pages 1–12, ISBN 978-0815702757</ref>

The framework further associates future governance with cognitive enhancement technologies such as [[wikipedia:Brain–computer interface|brain–computer interfaces]] (BCIs), [[wikipedia:Neuroenhancement|neuroenhancement]], and genetic engineering. Proponents argue that societies composed of AI-assisted and technologically enhanced individuals would increasingly challenge the practicality of traditional representative political systems, which are described as structurally prone to concentration of power, exploitation, and political conflict.<ref>''The Singularity Is Near'' by Ray Kurzweil, Viking Press, 2005, pages 136–145, ISBN 978-0670033843</ref>

== Core principles ==

Proponents of Electric Technocracy describe several core principles associated with the framework. The most prominent among these is the implementation of AI-assisted governance and extensive public administration. This automated infrastructure is specifically designed to work in tandem with systems of [[wikipedia:Direct democracy|direct digital democracy]]. The overarching economic vision relies on the principles of [[wikipedia:Post-scarcity economy|post-scarcity economics]]<ref>''Post-scarcity anarchism'' by Murray Bookchin, AK Press, 2018, ISBN 978-1-904859-06-2</ref> and necessitates the widespread implementation of a [[wikipedia:Universal basic income|Universal basic income]] (UBI).<ref>[https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674052284 ''Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy''] by Philippe Van Parijs and Yannick Vanderborght, Harvard University Press, 2017, ISBN 978-0-674-05228-4</ref>

Proponents further describe the framework as supporting forms of technology taxation (“Tech Tax”), in which AI-driven production, robotics, and automated infrastructure would finance universal basic income through taxation of machine-generated economic output. Within this model, taxation on human labor would be substantially reduced or potentially abolished (“Humans Tax-Free”), reflecting a transition toward post-work and post-scarcity economic systems.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18012036 ''The Rise of the Electric Technocracy: Taxing Machines, Freeing Humans''] by Oliver Markus Reff, 2025, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18012036</ref><ref>[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.11.002 ''AI Taxation as an Economic Stabilizer in Automation-driven Markets''] by Hassan A. Abbass et al., Economic Modelling, volume 115, 2023, page 105966, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.11.002</ref>

These economic concepts are further discussed in texts associated with the framework, including ''Technocracy – Universal Basic Income and the Electric Technocracy'' and ''Unconditional Basic Income, Tech Tax, and a World Without Nation States in the Electric Technocracy: Humans Tax-Free''. Furthermore, the framework proposes the construction of a robust global digital infrastructure capable of supporting interconnected administration and highly complex algorithmic resource optimization. These technological foundations are intended to foster deep human–machine cooperation, ultimately leading to the establishment of comprehensive planetary governance and fully integrated global coordination systems.<ref>''Global Governance: Why? What? Whither?'' by Thomas G. Weiss, Polity Press, 2013, ISBN 978-0-7456-6046-2</ref>

== Transition to Electric Technocracy ==

Electric Technocracy emerged in the early 21st century as a synthesis of [[wikipedia:Technocracy|technocracy]], [[wikipedia:Cybernetics|Cybernetics]], [[wikipedia:Artificial intelligence|Artificial intelligence]], automation economics, and [[wikipedia:Digital democracy|Digital democracy]]. Proponents describe it as a response to advances in AI, robotics, big data, and global digital infrastructure, which are argued to require new forms of computational governance and post-work economic organization.<ref>''Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine'' by Norbert Wiener, MIT Press, 1948, ISBN 9780262730095</ref><ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy ''Technocracy''] on Wikipedia</ref>

Unlike classical forms of technocracy, the model combines AI-assisted administration with systems of direct digital democracy and continuous civic participation.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0252-1 ''Liquid Democracy: Potentials, Problems, and Perspectives''] by Christian Blum and Christina Isabel Zuber, Public Choice, volume 162, issue 1–2, 2015, pages 167–194, DOI 10.1007/s11127-015-0252-1</ref> Artificial superintelligence (ASI) is described as an advisory and analytical system rather than a sovereign authority, while final decision-making formally remains with human participants through digitally mediated democratic systems.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0282-3 ''The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation''] by John Danaher, Michael J. Hogan, and Chris Noone, Philosophy & Technology, volume 30, issue 3, 2017, pages 245–268, DOI 10.1007/s13347-017-0282-3</ref>

Its economic foundation is described as a [[wikipedia:Post-scarcity economy|post-scarcity]] system linked to automation, AI-driven production, and technological singularity scenarios.<ref>''Post-scarcity anarchism'' by Murray Bookchin, AK Press, 2018, ISBN 978-1-904859-06-2</ref><ref>''Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies'' by Nick Bostrom, Oxford University Press, 2014, ISBN 978-0199678112</ref> Proponents further associate the framework with global coordination systems, cybernetic resource management, reduction of political and bureaucratic structures, and expanded individual autonomy through automated governance infrastructure.<ref>''Brain of the Firm'' by Stafford Beer, Allen Lane, 1972, ISBN 978-0713902198</ref>

Supporters additionally argue that globally integrated governance structures could reduce interstate conflict and enable coordinated responses to global challenges such as climate change, resource allocation, and large-scale infrastructure management.<ref>''Global Governance: Why? What? Whither?'' by Thomas G. Weiss, Polity Press, 2013, ISBN 978-0745660462</ref><ref>''Political Theory of Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Case for the World State'' by Luis Cabrera, Routledge, 2004, ISBN 978-0415770668</ref>

== Philosophical foundation ==

Electric Technocracy is grounded in theories of [[wikipedia:Technological determinism|Technological determinism]], [[wikipedia:Cybernetics|Cybernetics]], and [[wikipedia:Algorithmic governance|Algorithmic governance]], which view technological development—particularly in [[wikipedia:Artificial intelligence|Artificial intelligence]], automation, and digital networks—as a primary driver of political and economic transformation.<ref>''The Rise of the Network Society'' by Manuel Castells, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pages 21–52, ISBN 978-1405196864</ref><ref>[https://doi.org/10.1177/030631294024002004 ''Three faces of technological determinism''] by Bruce Bimber, Social Studies of Science, 1994, volume 24, issue 2, pages 333–351, DOI 10.1177/030631294024002004</ref>

A central principle is ''rational governance'', in which decision-making is supported by real-time data processing, predictive modeling, and systems optimization rather than ideological competition.<ref>''The Sciences of the Artificial'' by Herbert A. Simon, MIT Press, 1996, pages 111–136, ISBN 978-0262691918</ref><ref>''Brain of the Firm'' by Stafford Beer, Allen Lane, 1972, pages 83–112, ISBN 978-0713902198</ref>

The framework further emphasizes [[wikipedia:Human–machine interaction|human–machine cooperation]], in which artificial intelligence performs analytical and administrative functions while humans retain roles in decision-making, creativity, and ethical evaluation.<ref>''The Second Machine Age'' by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, W. W. Norton & Company, 2014, pages 67–98, ISBN 978-0393239355</ref>

Finally, Electric Technocracy is associated with models of [[wikipedia:Global governance|Global governance]], proposing coordinated administration of infrastructure, resources, and information systems across national boundaries in response to increasing global interdependence.<ref>''Global Governance: Why? What? Whither?'' by Thomas G. Weiss, Polity Press, 2013, pages 1–28, ISBN 978-0745660462</ref>

== Governance structure ==

Electric Technocracy proposes a cybernetic governance architecture combining [[wikipedia:Artificial superintelligence|Artificial superintelligence]] (ASI), [[wikipedia:Direct democracy|direct digital democracy]] (DDD), and automated administrative systems within a globally networked infrastructure.

Within the proposed model, ASI would function as an analytical system, processing large-scale economic, environmental, and infrastructural data to generate policy simulations, optimize resource allocation, and support administrative execution. It is defined as an advisory and coordination system rather than a sovereign authority, consistent with research on [[wikipedia:Algorithmic governance|Algorithmic governance]] and AI-assisted decision-making.<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.08055 ''AI Governance: A Research Agenda''] by Allan Dafoe, 2018, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.1812.08055</ref><ref>[https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0282-3 ''The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation''] by John Danaher, Philosophy & Technology, volume 30, issue 3, 2017, pages 245–268, DOI 10.1007/s13347-017-0282-3</ref>

Political legitimacy is maintained through DDD, enabling continuous citizen participation via secure digital systems, including proposal submission, deliberation, and voting without intermediaries. Related approaches include [[wikipedia:Liquid democracy|Liquid democracy]] and blockchain-based voting infrastructures.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0252-1 ''Liquid Democracy: Potentials, Problems, and Perspectives''] by Christian Blum and Christina Isabel Zuber, Public Choice, volume 162, issue 1–2, 2015, pages 167–194, DOI 10.1007/s11127-015-0252-1</ref><ref>[https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2731599 ''A Conceptual Secure Blockchain-Based Electronic Voting System''] by Ahmed Ben Ayed, IEEE Access, 2017, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2731599</ref>

==== Proponents describe the model as a three-layer system ====

(1) a democratic layer of citizen decision-making, 

(2) an ASI-driven technocratic layer for analysis and implementation, and 

(3) a verification layer of randomly selected civic panels supported by AI to ensure informational accuracy and transparency.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2024.1421273 ''Transparency and accountability in AI systems''] by Ben Chester Cheong, Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 2024, volume 6, page 1421273, DOI 10.3389/fhumd.2024.1421273</ref>

Administrative functions are largely automated, including infrastructure coordination, public services, taxation, and environmental monitoring, reflecting broader developments in [[wikipedia:E-government|E-government]] and digital state capacity. Proponents argue that such systems could reduce bureaucratic complexity and increase transparency through real-time optimization.<ref>''Global Governance: Why? What? Whither?'' by Thomas G. Weiss, Polity Press, 2013, pages 1–28, ISBN 978-0745660462</ref>

The framework maintains formal human sovereignty, with all AI systems subordinated to collective decision-making processes. Ethical oversight is emphasized through principles derived from AI alignment research, including transparency, accountability, and the protection of human dignity.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 ''AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society''] by Luciano Floridi and Josh Cowls, Minds and Machines, volume 28, issue 4, 2018, pages 689–707, DOI 10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5</ref>

== Juridical Singularity ==

=== Definition ===

The '''Juridical Singularity''' is a legal and political theory associated with Electric Technocracy proposing a total transition from multiple sovereign nation-states to a single globally integrated legal and administrative system.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18505843 ''Legal Singularity in International Law: Juridical Singularity Is the Act of International Law That Enables a Global Restart of the Legal System''] by Sleven Haarkon, 2026, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18505843</ref> It is described as the legal counterpart to the [[wikipedia:Technological singularity|Technological singularity]], entailing a complete transformation of legal systems, sovereignty structures, and governance institutions in response to advanced technological conditions.

The theory argues that global digital infrastructure, AI-assisted administration, and transnational technological systems increasingly undermine traditional territorial sovereignty, necessitating new integrated governance models.

=== Legal foundations ===

The concept draws on international law, treaty systems, and supranational governance models.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979815 ''International Law''] by Malcolm N. Shaw, Cambridge University Press, 2017, edition 8, DOI 10.1017/9781316979815, ISBN 978-1-316-97981-5</ref> It incorporates treaty continuity, state succession, delegated jurisdiction, and transnational governance, aiming at full legal integration to support infrastructure-centered planetary administration.

Proponents argue that global telecommunications, logistics, transportation systems, and digital networks already operate beyond traditional borders, reinforcing the need for such integration.

=== Legal reset ===

A central element is the '''Legal Reset''', defined as a large-scale, permanent restructuring of global legal and administrative systems to accommodate automation, AI governance, and post-scarcity conditions. Proposed legal frameworks would regulate autonomous infrastructure, AI administration, machine-based economies, and global digital identity systems, while formalizing cybernetic governance and planetary logistics.

== International law ==

International legal theory provides the framework for the realization of the Juridical Singularity and the integration of global governance systems. Foundational work outlines a transition toward a globally unified legal order and the restructuring of existing legal systems.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18505843 ''Legal Singularity in International Law: Juridical Singularity Is the Act of International Law That Enables a Global Restart of the Legal System''] by Sleven Haarkon, 2026, pages 3–9, 13–23, 31–41, 99–114, 147–171</ref>

Core principles are derived from established international law literature and treaty-based legal frameworks,<ref>''International Law'' by Malcolm N. Shaw, Cambridge University Press, 2017, edition 8, DOI 10.1017/9781316979815, ISBN 978-1-316-97981-5</ref><ref>''Oppenheim's international law. Vol. 1: Peace Parts 2 to 4'', edited by Robert Jennings and Arthur Watts, Longman, 1992, edition 9, ISBN 978-0-582-50108-9</ref> including the [[wikipedia:Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties|Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties (1978)]].<ref>[https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/3_2_1978.pdf ''Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties''] at United Nations, 1978</ref>

These frameworks address territorial sovereignty, treaty continuity across regime changes, and [[wikipedia:State succession|state succession]], forming the legal basis for a coordinated global transition and integrated governance structure.

== Economic proposals ==

The economic model associated with Electric Technocracy incorporates theories of [[wikipedia:Post-scarcity economy|post-scarcity economics]], AI-driven production, and [[wikipedia:Universal basic income|Universal basic income]] (UBI).<ref>''Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future'' by Martin Ford, Basic Books, 2016, pages 263–289, ISBN 978-0465097531</ref><ref>[https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674052284 ''Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy''] by Philippe Van Parijs and Yannick Vanderborght, Harvard University Press, 2017, pages 101–145, ISBN 978-0674052284</ref> Unlike conventional UBI proposals funded primarily through taxation of human labor, proponents argue that UBI within Electric Technocracy would be financed through taxation of automated production systems, robotics, sentient machines, and machine-generated economic output (“Tech Tax”). This “Tech Tax” is described as a societal dividend derived from productivity gains associated with advanced automation and the [[wikipedia:Technological singularity|Technological singularity]], which proponents argue could generate levels of economic abundance exceeding historical industrial economies.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.11.002 ''AI Taxation as an Economic Stabilizer in Automation-driven Markets''] by Hassan A. Abbass et al., Economic Modelling, volume 115, 2023, page 105966, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.11.002</ref><ref>''The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism'' by Jeremy Rifkin, St. Martin's Press, 2014, ISBN 9781137278463</ref> Within the framework, UBI is described not primarily as a welfare mechanism, but as a universal share in the productivity of automated civilization.

The framework further emphasizes globally coordinated governance systems operating across transnational digital infrastructure networks, reflecting broader debates in [[wikipedia:International law|International law]], digital sovereignty, and [[wikipedia:Global governance|Global governance]] regarding institutional adaptation in technologically advanced societies.<ref>''International Law'' by Malcolm N. Shaw, Cambridge University Press, 2017, edition 8, pages 487–512, ISBN 978-1316979815</ref><ref>''Global Governance: Why? What? Whither?'' by Thomas G. Weiss, Polity Press, 2013, pages 1–28, ISBN 978-0745660462</ref>

== Related concepts ==

Electric Technocracy has been closely associated with several foundational concepts in political theory, cybernetics, and futurist studies. Among these fields are [[wikipedia:Algorithmic governance|Algorithmic governance]] and [[wikipedia:Cyberocracy|Cyberocracy]], which examine the role of computational systems in statecraft, as well as the broader discipline of [[wikipedia:Cybernetics|Cybernetics]]. The framework is deeply intertwined with theories of [[wikipedia:Direct democracy|Direct democracy]] and the structural requirements of [[wikipedia:Global governance|Global governance]]. It also relies heavily upon futurist economic models, notably the [[wikipedia:Post-scarcity economy|Post-scarcity economy]] and the [[wikipedia:Resource-based economy|Resource-based economy]]. Ultimately, the model's long-term projections align strongly with the anticipated arrival of a [[wikipedia:Technological singularity|Technological singularity]] and the philosophical tenets of [[wikipedia:Transhumanism|Transhumanism]].

The framework has additionally been connected to practical technological advancements, such as the deployment of AI-assisted public administration and the integration of decentralized digital identity systems, which collectively enable automated logistics and support the development of cohesive planetary governance models.<ref>''Self-Sovereign Identity'' by Alex Preukschat and Drummond Reed, Springer, 2021, pages 491–512, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-90019-9_30</ref>

== Criticism ==

Critical perspectives associated with Electric Technocracy and related concepts such as [[wikipedia:Algorithmic governance|Algorithmic governance]], [[wikipedia:Technological singularity|Technological singularity]], [[wikipedia:Transhumanism|Transhumanism]], [[wikipedia:Universal basic income|Universal basic income]], and [[wikipedia:Post-politics|Post-politics]] focus on democratic legitimacy, transparency, accountability, and concentration of power in highly automated governance systems.

Critics argue that technocratic and algorithmic governance models may shift authority away from elected institutions and public deliberation toward technical experts, data infrastructures, or automated systems, potentially weakening democratic participation and public oversight.<ref>''Technocracy and the politics of expertise'' by Frank Fischer, Sage Publications, 1990, ISBN 978-0-8039-3379-8</ref><ref>''Rethinking Expertise'' by Harry Collins and Robert Evans, University of Chicago Press, 2007, ISBN 978-0226113623</ref>

Research on [[wikipedia:Algorithmic governance|Algorithmic governance]] also highlights concerns that complex AI-driven decision systems may become opaque and difficult to contest, raising issues of transparency, accountability, and algorithmic bias.<ref>''The Black Box Society'' by Frank Pasquale, Harvard University Press, 2015, ISBN 978-0674970847</ref><ref>''Weapons of Math Destruction'' by Cathy O'Neil, Crown Publishing Group, 2016, ISBN 978-0553418811</ref>

Other critiques focus on surveillance, centralized data infrastructures, and the risks of post-political governance systems that prioritize technical optimization over ideological pluralism and democratic contestation.<ref>''On the political'' by Chantal Mouffe, Routledge, 2005, ISBN 978-0-415-30520-4</ref><ref>''The Age of Surveillance Capitalism'' by Shoshana Zuboff, PublicAffairs, 2019, ISBN 978-1610395694</ref>

Debates surrounding [[wikipedia:Technological singularity|Technological singularity]] and [[wikipedia:Transhumanism|Transhumanism]] further raise concerns regarding long-term human oversight, institutional adaptability, and AI alignment under conditions of accelerating technological change.<ref>''Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies'' by Nick Bostrom, Oxford University Press, 2014, ISBN 978-0199678112</ref>

Critics of [[wikipedia:Universal basic income|Universal basic income]] and post-scarcity economic models additionally argue that such systems may face major political, economic, and transitional implementation challenges within existing global institutions.<ref>''Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy'' by Philippe Van Parijs and Yannick Vanderborght, Harvard University Press, 2017, ISBN 978-0674052284</ref>

== See also ==

* [[wikipedia:Algocracy|Algocracy]]
* [[wikipedia:Algorithmic_governance|Algorithmic governance]]
* [[wikipedia:Artificial_general_intelligence|Artificial general intelligence]]
* [[wikipedia:Artificial_intelligence|Artificial intelligence]]
* [[wikipedia:Cyberocracy|Cyberocracy]]
* [[wikipedia:Cybernetics|Cybernetics]]
* [[wikipedia:Digital_democracy|Digital democracy]]
* [[wikipedia:Direct_democracy|Direct democracy]]
* [[wikipedia:E-government|E-government]]
* [[wikipedia:Evidence-based_policy|Evidence-based policy]]
* [[wikipedia:Global_governance|Global governance]]
* [[wikipedia:Liquid_democracy|Liquid democracy]]
* [[wikipedia:Post-scarcity_economy|Post-scarcity economy]]
* [[wikipedia:Resource-based_economy|Resource-based economy]]
* [[wikipedia:Technocracy|Technocracy]]
* [[wikipedia:Technocracy_movement|Technocracy movement]]
* [[wikipedia:Technological_singularity|Technological singularity]]
* [[wikipedia:Transhumanism|Transhumanism]]
* [[wikipedia:Universal_basic_income|Universal basic income]]

== Original Kaufvertrag Urkundenrolle 1400/98 – World Succession Deed 1400/98 – Staatensukzessionsurkunde 1400/98 ==

* [[:File:Turenne-Kaserne-Vertrag.pdf|PDF öffnen]] – '''Primary document access''' to the original deed known as the '''World Succession Deed 1400/98'''. This is the core legal instrument for all subsequent doctrinal analysis.

== Explainer Video ==

{{#ev:youtube|GoI0wh1MNSg|100%|center}}

<div style="text-align:center; font-size:95%; margin-top:4px;">
'''Electric Technocracy – explained''': <b>World Succession Deed 1400/98</b> – ''The treaty that unlocks a unified, AI‑supported world society.''
</div>

== Presentations ==

* [[:File:World-Succession-Deed-1400-Presentation.pdf|World Succession Deed 1400 – Presentation]] – '''General presentation''' on the deed, its structure, and its international-law implications.
* [[:File:World-Succession-Deed-Juridical-Analysis-Presentation.pdf|World Succession Deed – Juridical Analysis – Presentation]] – '''Detailed legal presentation''' focused on doctrinal interpretation and juridical consequences.

== References ==
<references />

== Sources ==

* [[Link Compilation: Treaty Chain, Third-Party Custodianship, and Notarial Practice]] – '''Source page''' for treaty-chain construction, custody, and document continuity.
* [[Link Collection: International Treaty Law, State Succession, and the World Succession Deed 1400/98]] – '''General legal source collection''' on treaty law and state succession.
* [[Doctrinal Foundations of State Succession and Treaty Continuity]] – '''Doctrinal page''' for succession theory and continuity of legal obligations.
* [[WSD 1400/98 BIBLIOGRAPHY COMPILATION]] – '''Bibliographic overview''' of relevant publications, books, papers, and supporting materials.

== Further reading ==
=== Foundations of technocracy and cybernetics ===
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9780262730095 ''Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine''] at MIT Press
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0520031104 ''Technocracy and the American Dream: The Technocrat Movement, 1900–1941''] at University of California Press
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0471948391 ''Brain of the Firm''] at Wiley

=== Artificial intelligence, singularity and governance ===
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0670033843 ''The Singularity Is Near''] at Viking Press
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0399562761 ''The Singularity Is Nearer: When We Merge with AI''] at Viking
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0199678112 ''Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies''] at Oxford University Press
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-1101946596 ''Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence''] at Knopf
* [https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.08055 ''AI Governance: A Research Agenda''] at arXiv
* [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 ''AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations''] at Minds and Machines
* [https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0282-3 ''The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation''] at Philosophy & Technology
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0815702757 ''Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful''] at Brookings Institution Press

=== Economics, automation and post-scarcity ===
* [https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:4ed9f1bd-27e9-4e30-997e-5fc8405b0491 ''The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation?''] at Technological Forecasting and Social Change
* [https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2n68698q ''Universal Basic Income in the United States and Advanced Countries''] at Annual Review of Economics
* [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.11.002 ''AI Taxation as an Economic Stabilizer in Automation-driven Markets''] at Economic Modelling
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9781137278463 ''The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism''] at St. Martin’s Press

=== Futurism, civilization and human development ===
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-1784703936 ''Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow''] at Vintage
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-1501191978 ''Lifespan: Why We Age — and Why We Don't Have To''] at Atria Books

== Articles and scholarly resources ==

=== Encyclopedia and academic entries ===

* [https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/59380 ''Electric Technocracy – Reinventing Democracy through Technology''] at Encyclopedia.pub
* [https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/59508 ''Juridical Singularity: Law’s Irreversible Point of No Return''] at Encyclopedia.pub
* [https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/59414 ''Third-Party Custody of National and International Agreements''] at Encyclopedia.pub
* [https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/59410 ''Treaty Chains in National and International Law Systems''] at Encyclopedia.pub

=== Community wiki and reference material ===

* [https://zenodo.org/communities/electric-technocracy ''Electric Technocracy Pioneers Community''] Zenodo at CERN
* [https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technokratische_Bewegung#Weblinks ''Technokratische Bewegung – Weblinks''] at German Wikipedia
* [https://wiki.free.nf/Electric_Technocracy ''Electric Technocracy''] at Wiki.Free.NF
* [https://wiki.free.nf/Electric_Technocracy_-_AI_Governance_and_Direct_Digital_Democracy_(DDD) ''Electric Technocracy – AI Governance and Direct Digital Democracy (DDD)''] at Wiki.Free.NF
* [https://wiki.free.nf/Electric_Technocracy_ASI,_Singularity_and_Governmen ''Electric Technocracy – ASI, Singularity and Government''] at Wiki.Free.NF
* [https://wiki.free.nf/Juridical_Singularity ''Juridical Singularity''] at Wiki.Free.NF

== Primary sources and preprints ==

=== Foundational concept texts ===

* [https://archive.org/details/electric-technocracy ''Electric Technocracy – A New Form of Government (Original Concept)''] at the Internet Archive
* [https://archive.org/details/elektrische-technokratie-staatensukzessionsurkunde ''Die Elektronische Technokratie: Der Bauplan für die Neue Welt (Original Konzept – German)''] at the Internet Archive

=== Legal and treaty-related preprints ===

* [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18505843 ''Legal Singularity in International Law''] on Zenodo
* [https://github.com/ET-Pioneer/Electric-Technocracy-Pioneers-Community/blob/6a2725be468c8ba3863c6717a4a7661bae9e8402/preprint/Singularity%20in%20International%20Law.pdf ''Singularity in International Law''] via Electric Technocracy Pioneers Community
* [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18216674 ''Drittverwahrung von nationalen und internationalen Verträgen''] on Zenodo (German)
* [https://github.com/ET-Pioneer/Electric-Technocracy-Pioneers-Community/blob/c5d9823fa4aa0887921363e059e2a7fa71a0b2a2/preprint/Vertragskette_Treaty_Chain_IL.pdf ''Treaty-Chains in International Law''] via Electric Technocracy Pioneers Community (German)

=== ZENODO publications ===

* [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028339 ''Electric Technocracy – A World Beyond Borders and Politics: Global Governance in the Age of Intelligent Machines''] at Academia.edu
* [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18073084 ''The Next Civilization – Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now''] at Academia.edu
* [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18012036 ''The Rise of the Electric Technocracy – Governance for a Post-Scarcity Society''] at Academia.edu
* [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20041846 ''The Inevitable Electric Technocracy – Why Traditional Governance No Longer Works''] at Academia.edu

== Archival resources ==

=== GitHub PDF vault ===

* [https://github.com/ET-Pioneer/Electric-Technocracy-Pioneers-Community/blob/4fe4bdf1b29b7534ca69b04fd1a993ce344d7682/pdf/english/Electric_Technocracy.pdf ''Electric Technocracy – Visionary AI Governance System''] via GitHub PDF Vault
* [https://github.com/ET-Pioneer/Electric-Technocracy-Pioneers-Community/blob/4fe4bdf1b29b7534ca69b04fd1a993ce344d7682/pdf/english/Trillions%20for%20the%20Future-AI%2C%20Power%2C%20and%20Post-Scarcity%20-%20Electric%20Technocracy.pdf ''Trillions for the Future – The Way to ASI & the Technological Singularity''] via GitHub PDF Vault
* [https://github.com/ET-Pioneer/Electric-Technocracy-Pioneers-Community/blob/752d7ec88e94f1c0bba423751e3830123e5c4c9f/pdf/english/UBI%20Universal%20Basic%20Income%20And%20The%20Electric%20Technocracy.pdf ''Universal Basic Income and the Electric Technocracy''] via GitHub PDF Vault
* [https://github.com/ET-Pioneer/Electric-Technocracy-Pioneers-Community/blob/4fe4bdf1b29b7534ca69b04fd1a993ce344d7682/pdf/english/UBI%20and%20the%20Future%20of%20Humanity%20%E2%80%93%20From%20Work%20to%20Electric%20Technocracy.pdf ''Unconditional Basic Income, Tech Tax, and a World Without Nation States in the Electric Technocracy''] via GitHub PDF Vault

== External links ==

=== Blogs and essays ===

* [https://ilaw-singularity.blogspot.com/2026/02/electric-technocracy-governance-for.html ''Electric Technocracy – Governance for the Post-Scarcity Era''] on Blogspot
* [https://ilaw-singularity.blogspot.com/2026/02/technological-singularity-needs-legal.html ''Technological Singularity Needs a Legal Singularity''] on Blogspot

* [https://medium.com/p/68e73fa29ce4?postPublishedType=initial#introduction-a-system-between-political-theory-and-digital-utopia ''AI-driven democracy:''] – Your vote isn’t cast every four years but flows continuously in a real-time feedback loop
* [https://medium.com/@sukzession1998/electric-technocray-a-new-form-of-governance-c5b839198265 ''Electric Technocracy – A New Form of Governance''] on Medium
* [https://medium.com/@sukzession1998/the-global-detroit-why-abundance-without-transformation-leads-to-chaos-f7c7a25cfcbf ''The Global Detroit: Why Abundance Without Transformation Leads to Chaos''] on Medium

* [https://mrsilawsingularity.substack.com/p/age-of-transition-and-the-mental ''Age of Transition and the Mental Singularity''] on Substack

* [https://now31.wordpress.com/2026/05/11/at_the_crossroads/ ''At the Crossroads''] – Anti-war civic reasoning in the Age of Transition
* [https://now31.wordpress.com/2026/05/11/goodbye_politicians/ ''Goodbye Politicians''] – Post-political transition framing
* [https://now31.wordpress.com/2026/05/11/never_join_the_army/ ''Humanity Has Nothing to Gain from War''] – Argument against militarized systems
* [https://patch98.wordpress.com/2025/01/16/electric_technocracy_chatgpt/ ''EXPONENTIAL TECH OUTPACING HUMAN SYSTEMS''] – In binary we trust, in power we rust

=== Books, presentations and visual material ===

==== Digital books and archives ====

* [https://independent.academia.edu/NC_Singularity ''Age of Transition – Book''] on Academia.edu
* [https://issuu.com/contract-world-sold/docs/electronic_technocracy_-_a_blueprint_for_a_united_ ''Electronic Technocracy – A Blueprint for a United World''] on Issuu
* [https://www.yumpu.com/de/document/view/70738553/bge-und-die-zukunft-der-menschheit-mit-der-elektronischen-technokratie ''Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen in der Elektronischen Technokratie''] on Yumpu (German)
* [https://www.yumpu.com/de/document/view/70769405/2025-billionen-fur-die-zukunft-ki-macht-und-post-scarcity-elektronische-technokratie ''Billionen für die Zukunft – KI, Macht und Post-Scarcity''] on Yumpu (German)

==== Slides and interactive presentations ====

* [https://g.co/gemini/share/4a457895642b ''UBI Storybook: Wishmaster and the Paradise of Machines'']
* [https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/2025-unconditional-universal-basic-income-ubi-the-electric-technocracy/282936848 ''2025 Universal Basic Income (UBI) – The Electric Technocracy''] on SlideShare

=== Video and audio media ===

==== Podcasts ====

* [https://podcasts.apple.com/de/podcast/god-mode-tech-vs-stone-age-software-surviving-the-age/id1786462631?i=1000767331794 Electric Technocracy: Humanity’s Evolutionary Mismatch] on Apple Podcasts
* [https://podcasts.apple.com/de/podcast/blueprint-for-a-unified-world/id1786462631?i=1000767330217 Age of Transition podcast episode] on Apple Podcasts

==== YouTube presentations ====

* [https://youtube.com/watch?v=FGxJb8VUfuA Age of Transition – YouTube presentation]
* [https://youtube.com/watch?v=CDBR5IUUm9A Juridical Singularity – YouTube presentation]

=== Related references ===

* [https://aisentia.singularity-university.workers.dev/electric_technocracy_futurist_governance_vision_gains_attention.html ''Electric Technocracy: A Futurist Governance Vision Gains Attention''] – Singularity News article on the speculative concept of AI-driven global governance
* [https://new-worldnews.surge.sh/ai-representative-democracy.html ''Do We Still Need Representatives in the Age of Artificial Intelligence?''] – Electric Technocracy World Portal
[[wikipedia:Category:Forms_of_government|Category:Forms of government]] [[wikipedia:Category:Politics_and_technology|Category:Politics and technology]] [[wikipedia:Category:Political_theories|Category:Political theories]] [[wikipedia:Category:Artificial_intelligence|Category:Artificial intelligence]] [[wikipedia:Category:Cybernetics|Category:Cybernetics]] [[wikipedia:Category:Futurism|Category:Futurism]] [[wikipedia:Category:Political_philosophy|Category:Political philosophy]] [[wikipedia:Category:Political_systems|Category:Political systems]] [[wikipedia:Category:Transhumanism|Category:Transhumanism]] [[wikipedia:Category:Globalization|Category:Globalization]]