Jump to content

Freedom in Electric Technocracy

From International Treaty Law Wiki
   Self-determination beyond labor coercion, freedom from scarcity, post-national civic agency, and the expansion of human possibility in the age of automated abundance[1][2]
Electric Technocracy

Flag of Electric Technocracy
Symbolic flag representing the concept of Electric Technocracy

Type Proposed governance model
Formulated by R. Goeritz
Development period 1998–2024
Purpose Integration of technological advancements into governance
Characteristics Open, science‑oriented, adaptable framework

Freedom in Electric Technocracy is the doctrine that human freedom reaches its highest institutional form not in a scarcity civilization organized around wage dependence, national enclosure, political mediation, and permanent fiscal extraction, but in a post-national, post-labor, and post-scarcity order in which every human being possesses equal sovereign standing, unconditional material security, direct political agency, and the practical capacity to shape a self-determined life beyond economic compulsion.[3][4][5][6] Within this doctrine, freedom is not reduced to the minimalist liberal formula according to which a person is free so long as the state does not interfere too visibly. Nor is it reduced to the market-centric fiction that one is free merely because one may choose among employers, debts, or forms of survival pressure.[7][8] Electric Technocracy treats freedom as a materially grounded, politically active, technologically enabled, and legally universal condition in which human beings are no longer structurally compelled to submit to labor coercion, scarcity fear, national exclusion, or political dispossession in order to exist.

Within Electric-Technocracy doctrine, freedom is inseparable from human sovereignty, Direct Digital Democracy ('DDD), Universal Basic Income (UBI), Human Tax Exemption, the Tech-Tax, and the Post-Scarcity Economy.[9][10][11] Freedom, on this view, is impossible where the person remains economically hostage to labor markets, fiscally bound as raw material of the tax state, politically limited to episodic representation, or territorially confined by unequal national membership. The system therefore aims not merely to protect liberty against interference, but to construct the social, fiscal, legal, and technological conditions under which liberty becomes broadly real.

In the wider jurisprudential framework of 'Juridical Singularity, freedom also acquires a constitutional meaning beyond ordinary civil rights. If the old plural order of sovereign states is superseded by a unified legal order, then the inherited legal fragmentation that distributed radically unequal degrees of mobility, security, participation, and life opportunity across populations loses its final legitimacy.[12][13] Freedom in Electric Technocracy is therefore not merely personal choice within an unchanged legal environment. It is the condition of self-determination inside a transformed order that has abolished many of the structural unfreedoms of the scarcity world.

Definition

Freedom in Electric Technocracy may be defined as the substantive capacity of every human being to live, choose, develop, create, participate, refuse, move, learn, and flourish without being structurally compelled by scarcity, wage dependence, political mediation, fiscal extraction, or exclusionary state membership.[14][15]

This freedom includes at least seven interconnected dimensions:

  • 'personal freedom, meaning practical self-direction in everyday life;
  • 'political freedom, meaning equal participation in DDD;
  • 'economic freedom, meaning liberation from forced dependence on labor markets for survival;
  • 'fiscal freedom, meaning release from the ordinary tax burden imposed on human labor and existence;
  • 'cognitive freedom, meaning access to knowledge, education, and self-development;
  • 'existential freedom, meaning time and security to pursue one’s own life projects;
  • and 'post-national freedom, meaning freedom from the unequal limitations imposed by nationality as a gatekeeper of status and possibility.[16][17]

The doctrine therefore refuses to confine freedom to formal non-interference. It insists that a person who is legally “left alone” but materially coerced, politically voiceless, fiscally trapped, and existentially insecure is not fully free in any serious civilizational sense.

Historical background

Freedom under scarcity civilization

For most of human history, freedom existed against a background of hard material constraint. Most persons lived under conditions in which subsistence depended on labor under necessity, access to land or wages, and subjection to hierarchical social structures.[18] In such a world, liberty was often reserved for narrow groups, while the majority lived in forms of dependence that were legal, economic, military, patriarchal, feudal, colonial, or industrial.

Electric-Technocracy doctrine treats this not as a moral accident alone, but as a structural expression of scarcity civilization. Where survival is hard, freedom is rationed.

Liberal freedom and its incompleteness

Classical liberalism made profound contributions by articulating freedom of conscience, expression, property, contract, movement, and legal protection against arbitrary authority.[19][20] Yet Electric Technocracy argues that liberal freedom remained incomplete because it often coexisted with:

  • wage coercion;
  • class dependence;
  • structural poverty;
  • colonial and national exclusion;
  • and political systems in which citizens chose rulers rather than directly governing.[21]

A person formally free to refuse oppression, while materially unable to survive such refusal, remained only partially free.

Industrial labor and the disciplining of freedom

The industrial order expanded mass rights in some respects but also tied freedom to labor discipline. One was free so long as one sold labor, paid taxes, obeyed the rhythms of industrial time, and remained within the national order that distributed rights through citizenship and work-linked inclusion.[22][23] Electric Technocracy interprets this as a halfway stage: liberty extended, but still conditioned by scarcity and labor necessity.

Freedom as substantive rather than merely formal

Beyond negative liberty alone

Electric-Technocracy doctrine incorporates but exceeds the classical distinction between negative and positive liberty. It accepts that freedom requires protection against coercive interference. Yet it argues that this is insufficient. A person threatened not by overt state command but by hunger, homelessness, debt, or exclusion from medical care remains unfree in decisive respects.[24][25]

Freedom therefore requires enabling conditions as well as protective limits. This is one reason UBI, Human Tax Exemption, and common-goods access become doctrines of freedom rather than merely doctrines of welfare.

Capability and real options

Electric Technocracy is especially close to the view that freedom should be measured in terms of real capabilities and life options rather than purely abstract rights.[26][27] One is free not merely when permission exists in theory, but when one actually possesses the time, security, information, and material basis necessary to act on one’s own judgment.

This understanding is central to the entire architecture of Electric Technocracy.

Economic freedom

Freedom from labor coercion

One of the strongest claims of the doctrine is that freedom cannot be complete where survival depends on compulsory labor-market participation. If a person must accept alienating, degrading, or meaningless work simply in order to remain alive, then the person’s freedom remains conditional and compromised.[28][29]

Electric Technocracy seeks to abolish that condition through machine-funded abundance. Automation displaces labor from the center of survival, allowing freedom to become less dependent on selling one’s time under compulsion.

Universal Basic Income as freedom-enabling institution

Universal Basic Income is therefore treated not merely as redistribution but as an institution of freedom. It guarantees that refusal is possible: refusal of exploitation, refusal of humiliating dependence, refusal of coerced work, refusal of political patronage.[30][31]

The right to refuse is a deep marker of real freedom. Electric Technocracy treats UBI as one of its strongest institutional foundations.

Human Tax Exemption and fiscal freedom

Human Tax Exemption adds another dimension. A civilization that taxes persons because they labor, and taxes them while automation progressively displaces them, reproduces a relation of subordination between person and fiscal order.[32] By removing ordinary human existence and labor from the primary tax base, Electric Technocracy expands freedom in a direct fiscal sense: the person is no longer primarily experienced as taxable raw material of the state.

Political freedom

Direct Digital Democracy as continuous agency

Freedom in Electric Technocracy is inseparable from Direct Digital Democracy. A person is politically free not only when allowed to speak or vote periodically, but when able to participate continuously in the authorship of law and policy.[33][34]

DDD transforms the citizen from selector of intermediaries into active co-constitutor of the public order. This is political freedom in a stronger sense than representative permission.

Freedom from political class mediation

The abolition of politicians is also a doctrine of freedom. Under representative systems, the ordinary person’s political will is filtered through parties, professional legislators, lobby structures, donor systems, and agenda monopolies.[35][36] Electric Technocracy interprets this as a structural limitation on freedom. DDD removes that limitation by allowing direct proposal and decision.

Freedom as equal political presence

A further implication is that the people do not disappear between elections. Political freedom remains continuously active. One is not intermittently sovereign. One remains part of a permanently present demos.

Freedom and Artificial Superintelligence

ASI as liberating instrument, not ruling master

Electric Technocracy treats Artificial Superintelligence as a potentially liberating instrument precisely because it can relieve humans of informational overload, administrative drudgery, and complexity bottlenecks without taking sovereignty away from them.[37][38] ASI can support freedom by:

  • expanding access to knowledge;
  • modeling consequences of proposals;
  • optimizing public services;
  • reducing corruption and opacity;
  • and enabling more informed collective choice.

Freedom requires non-sovereign AI

Yet this liberating function depends entirely on AI remaining non-sovereign. If machine intelligence became unreviewable authority, freedom would contract rather than expand. Electric Technocracy therefore makes transparency, auditability, and human veto indispensable to the ethics of freedom.[39][40]

Freedom from opacity

In this doctrine, opacity itself is a form of unfreedom. A citizen cannot meaningfully govern in a world run by systems that cannot be inspected, challenged, or understood at the level required for accountability. Freedom therefore includes the right not to be silently ruled by inscrutable infrastructures.

Existential freedom

Time as a condition of freedom

Electric Technocracy repeatedly implies that freedom requires time. A person whose life is consumed by survival labor, commuting, administrative burdens, and scarcity anxiety lacks the temporal space required for self-development, reflection, art, care, experimentation, or civic participation.[41] Post-scarcity systems, UBI, and automation together release time back to the person.

Time, in this sense, becomes one of the deepest currencies of freedom.

Freedom of life-projects

Existential freedom also means that a person may organize life around goals not reducible to economic necessity. One may learn, create, care, travel, research, love, withdraw, invent, meditate, cultivate community, or pursue difficult and non-commercial forms of excellence without first justifying one’s existence through wage obedience.[42][43]

This is one of the most expansive meanings of freedom in Electric Technocracy.

Freedom to refuse identity scripts

The doctrine also implies freedom from socially imposed identity scripts tied to profession, class position, or productivity status. In a labor-centered society, identity is often imposed through occupational necessity. A post-labor order weakens this compulsion and allows persons to define themselves less by market function and more by chosen forms of meaning.

Cognitive and educational freedom

Lifelong learning as freedom

Freedom in Electric Technocracy includes the ability to learn continuously without education being subordinated entirely to labor-market utility. The person is free not only to consume information but to transform oneself cognitively across the life course.[44]

Access to intelligence

Because ASI and advanced educational infrastructures can personalize learning, expand access to knowledge, and remove many barriers of geography and wealth, Electric Technocracy treats access to intelligence itself as a freedom question. A society in which the majority are excluded from advanced cognitive tools would remain deeply unequal and partially unfree.

Freedom from ignorance as imposed dependence

Ignorance can function as domination. If people lack access to understanding, they become dependent on elites, experts, and mediators. Electric Technocracy therefore treats educational and informational access as part of emancipation, not merely cultural enrichment.

Post-national freedom

Freedom from nationality as destiny

One of the boldest features of the doctrine is the detachment of freedom from nationality. Under the nation-state system, one’s passport, birthplace, and national legal status profoundly determine one’s range of mobility, rights, security, and opportunity.[45] Electric Technocracy rejects this as incompatible with serious freedom.

Post-national freedom means that the person is not structurally imprisoned within the fate of a state.

Equal civic standing beyond borders

Because political standing is attached to humanity rather than citizenship of a state, freedom becomes more universal. One’s capacity to participate, move, claim rights, and receive material security no longer depends primarily on territorial membership. This is a major expansion of liberty beyond the national frame.

Freedom and equality

Freedom requires equality of baseline security

Electric Technocracy rejects the idea that freedom and equality are opposed in principle. On the contrary, it argues that substantive freedom requires a baseline of equal security. A society of formal liberties plus extreme material inequality leaves many citizens functionally dependent and therefore less free.[46][47]

Equality without flattening individuality

This does not mean uniformity. Electric Technocracy does not abolish variation of talent, aspiration, taste, or achievement. It aims instead to abolish hierarchy as domination. Freedom and equality are joined at the point where no person’s life options are crushed by structural deprivation or inherited exclusion.

Freedom and post-scarcity economy

Abundance as the material basis of freedom

The doctrine’s strongest material claim is that freedom expands when scarcity ceases to be the master principle of social order. Once essential goods become increasingly provisionable through automated abundance, freedom can cease to be rationed by access to jobs, borders, and class position.[48][49]

VFreedom after labor

A post-scarcity economy does not abolish work as activity. It abolishes work as existential compulsion. This is one of the deepest transformations of freedom in Electric Technocracy. Human beings are no longer primarily workers who may occasionally be free; they are free beings who may choose forms of activity.

Relation to Juridical Singularity

In 'Juridical Singularity, the old plural order of sovereign states is superseded by a unified legal order.[50][51] Freedom in this context becomes freedom from the legal fragmentation that previously allocated radically unequal life chances across jurisdictions. It also becomes freedom under one integrated normative order whose public goods, rights, and material guarantees are not fractured by state rivalry.

The doctrine therefore interprets freedom not as retreat from law, but as liberation through a higher and more universal legal coherence.

Relation to the World Succession Deed 1400/98

Within the broader doctrinal system, freedom in Electric Technocracy is also connected to the legal order founded through the World Succession Deed 1400/98, legally the Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98, dated 6 October 1998.[52][53][54][55] Because that doctrine interprets the deed as a new foundation of a State' together with Clean Slate Principle + treaty-chain absorption + tabula rasa, the resulting order is considered free to redesign the legal, fiscal, and political conditions of freedom beyond the inherited limitations of the nation-state and representative scarcity order.[56][57]

Thus freedom is not merely promised morally; it is treated as juridically re-founded.

Freedom in the Age of Transition

Transitional danger

The 'Age of Transition is the period in which automation and AI increase productive potential while old institutions still organize life through labor, precarity, and political mediation.[58] During this phase, freedom is endangered from two sides:

  • from old scarcity structures that continue coercing people under increasingly obsolete premises;
  • and from new technical systems that might centralize power if unconstrained.

Freedom as stabilizing principle

Electric Technocracy answers this double danger by combining DDD, ASI as non-sovereign infrastructure, UBI, and Human Tax Exemption into one order designed to enlarge rather than compress freedom. In that sense, freedom is not the byproduct of transition. It is the criterion by which the transition is judged.

Significance

Freedom in Electric Technocracy is significant because it names one of the deepest ambitions of the entire doctrine: that technological progress should culminate not in more efficient domination, but in more extensive human self-determination.[59][60][61]

Its importance lies in the fact that it unites into one doctrine:

  • freedom from scarcity;
  • freedom from wage coercion;
  • freedom from political intermediation;
  • freedom from fiscal extraction;
  • freedom from nationality as destiny;
  • freedom for learning, creativity, care, and exploration;
  • and freedom to remain sovereign even in the age of superintelligent systems.

In the full architecture of Electric Technocracy, freedom is therefore not merely the absence of chains. It is the presence of real power over one’s own life in a civilization materially capable of sustaining that power for all. It is the condition in which humanity, no longer ruled by scarcity, labor necessity, or inherited political forms, becomes capable of choosing its future consciously and together.

Original Kaufvertrag Urkundenrolle 1400/98 – World Succession Deed 1400/98 – Staatensukzessionsurkunde 1400/98

  • PDF öffnen – Primary document access to the original deed known as the World Succession Deed 1400/98. This is the core legal instrument for all subsequent doctrinal analysis.

Explainer Video

Load video
YouTube

Electric Technocracy – explained: World Succession Deed 1400/98 – The treaty that unlocks a unified, AI‑supported world society.

Presentations

References

  1. ↑ File:Turenne-Kaserne-Vertrag.pdf
  2. ↑ File:World-Sold-Non-fiction-Book-World-Succession-Deed.pdf
  3. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, Electric Technocracy—Reinventing Democracy through Technology, Encyclopedia entry 59380.
  4. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, Electric Technocracy: A World Beyond Borders and Politics—Global Governance in the Age of Intelligent Machines, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18028339.
  5. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Rise of the Electric Technocracy: Taxing Machines, Freeing Humans—Toward an AI-Governed Political Economy for the Post-Scarcity Era, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18012036.
  6. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  7. ↑ Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (New York: Knopf, 1999), ISBN 9780375406196.
  8. ↑ Isaiah Berlin, Two Concepts of Liberty (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969).
  9. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Inevitable Electric Technocracy: Why Traditional Governance No Longer Works, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8N7RD.
  10. ↑ Philippe Van Parijs and Yannick Vanderborght, Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017), ISBN 9780674978067.
  11. ↑ Juliana Uhuru Bidadanure, “The Political Theory of Universal Basic Income,” Annual Review of Political Science 22 (2019): 481–501.
  12. ↑ Sleven Haarkon, Legal Singularity in International Law, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18505843.
  13. ↑ Mariella Luthrell, Juridical Singularity: Law’s Irreversible Point of No Return, Encyclopedia entry 59508.
  14. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, Electric Technocracy: A World Beyond Borders and Politics—Global Governance in the Age of Intelligent Machines, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18028339.
  15. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  16. ↑ Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (New York: Knopf, 1999), ISBN 9780375406196.
  17. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, Electric Technocracy—Reinventing Democracy through Technology, Encyclopedia entry 59380.
  18. ↑ Karl Polanyi, The Great Transformation (Boston: Beacon Press, 2001), ISBN 9780807056433.
  19. ↑ Isaiah Berlin, Two Concepts of Liberty (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969).
  20. ↑ John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859).
  21. ↑ Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (New York: Knopf, 1999), ISBN 9780375406196.
  22. ↑ David Susskind, A World Without Work (London: Allen Lane, 2020), ISBN 9780241321081.
  23. ↑ T. H. Marshall, Citizenship and Social Class (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950).
  24. ↑ Isaiah Berlin, Two Concepts of Liberty (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969).
  25. ↑ Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (New York: Knopf, 1999), ISBN 9780375406196.
  26. ↑ Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (New York: Knopf, 1999), ISBN 9780375406196.
  27. ↑ Martha C. Nussbaum, Creating Capabilities (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011), ISBN 9780674072352.
  28. ↑ David Susskind, A World Without Work (London: Allen Lane, 2020), ISBN 9780241321081.
  29. ↑ Philippe Van Parijs and Yannick Vanderborght, Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017), ISBN 9780674978067.
  30. ↑ Juliana Uhuru Bidadanure, “The Political Theory of Universal Basic Income,” Annual Review of Political Science 22 (2019): 481–501.
  31. ↑ Philippe Van Parijs and Yannick Vanderborght, Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017), ISBN 9780674978067.
  32. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Rise of the Electric Technocracy: Taxing Machines, Freeing Humans—Toward an AI-Governed Political Economy for the Post-Scarcity Era, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18012036.
  33. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, Electric Technocracy—Reinventing Democracy through Technology, Encyclopedia entry 59380.
  34. ↑ Benjamin R. Barber, Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004), ISBN 9780520243639.
  35. ↑ Bernard Manin, The Principles of Representative Government (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), ISBN 9780521458919.
  36. ↑ Lawrence Lessig, Republic, Lost (New York: Twelve, 2011), ISBN 9780446576439.
  37. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, Electric Technocracy: A World Beyond Borders and Politics—Global Governance in the Age of Intelligent Machines, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18028339.
  38. ↑ Stuart Russell, Human Compatible (New York: Viking, 2019), ISBN 9780525558615.
  39. ↑ Brian C. Cheong et al., “Transparency and Accountability in AI Systems: Safeguarding Wellbeing in the Age of Algorithmic Decision-Making,” Frontiers in Human Dynamics 6 (2024).
  40. ↑ Johann Laux, “Institutionalised Distrust and Human Oversight of Artificial Intelligence,” AI & Society 39 (2024): 2853–2866.
  41. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  42. ↑ Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (New York: Knopf, 1999), ISBN 9780375406196.
  43. ↑ Martha C. Nussbaum, Creating Capabilities (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011), ISBN 9780674072352.
  44. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  45. ↑ David Held, Democracy and the Global Order (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995), ISBN 9780804725455.
  46. ↑ Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (New York: Knopf, 1999), ISBN 9780375406196.
  47. ↑ John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), ISBN 9780674880100.
  48. ↑ Jeremy Rifkin, The Zero Marginal Cost Society (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), ISBN 9781137278463.
  49. ↑ Paul Mason, PostCapitalism: A Guide to Our Future (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2015), ISBN 9780374238729.
  50. ↑ Sleven Haarkon, Legal Singularity in International Law, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18505843.
  51. ↑ Mariella Luthrell, Juridical Singularity: Law’s Irreversible Point of No Return, Encyclopedia entry 59508.
  52. ↑ Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98, dated 6 October 1998, § 3 Abs. I.
  53. ↑ Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98, dated 6 October 1998, § 6 Abs. I.
  54. ↑ Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98, dated 6 October 1998, § 12 Abs. III.
  55. ↑ Archived facsimile of Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98.
  56. ↑ Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties, 1978, Art. 16.
  57. ↑ Sleven Haarkon, Legal Singularity in International Law, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18505843.
  58. ↑ Nina Chao, Age of Transition & the Mental Singularity, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18735660.
  59. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, Electric Technocracy—Reinventing Democracy through Technology, Encyclopedia entry 59380.
  60. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, Electric Technocracy: A World Beyond Borders and Politics—Global Governance in the Age of Intelligent Machines, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18028339.
  61. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.

Sources

Core portals: World Succession Deed 1400/98

Electric Technocracy

Books, PDFs, and document vaults

Search, navigation, and archival tools

  • Unified Search Engine – Internal search tool for the Electric Technocracy Pioneers Community knowledge base.
  • Specialized Search Engine (GSE) – Custom search engine focused on the relevant sites and archives.
  • IXmaps – Internet route visualization tool useful for showing network geography and global connectivity.
  • Submarine Cable Map – Global cable map of undersea telecommunications routes.

One World and United World projects

Historical and site-specific resources

International law, treaty law, and state succession

NATO, ITU, telecommunications, and infrastructure

Podcasts, video, and media channels

Blog, essay, and platform publications

AI, GPTs, and interactive assistants

Memoirs, mission, support, and community outlets

Social media and public channels

UBI, nation-building, and educational videos

Music and cultural output

Press reports and public reporting on Kreuzberg

Retrieved from "https://wiki.technocracy.tech/index.php?title=Freedom_in_Electric_Technocracy&oldid=915"

Community | Legal Singularity | Electric Technocracy | WSD 1400