Jump to content

Electric Technocracy A New Form Of Government

From International Treaty Law Wiki
   Post-national governance, Direct Digital Democracy, non-sovereign artificial superintelligence, machine taxation, universal dividend, and the juridical reorganization of public order in the age of automation[1][2]
Electric Technocracy

Flag of Electric Technocracy
Symbolic flag representing the concept of Electric Technocracy

Type Proposed governance model
Formulated by R. Goeritz
Development period 1998–2024
Purpose Integration of technological advancements into governance
Characteristics Open, science‑oriented, adaptable framework

Electric Technocracy is a post-national governance architecture for a highly automated civilization in which human sovereignty is preserved through Direct Digital Democracy (DDD), while Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) operates as strictly non-sovereign analytical and administrative infrastructure.[3][4][5][6] It abolishes the fiscal, political, and territorial primacy of the industrial nation-state by replacing labor-based taxation with a Tech Tax on non-sentient machine productivity, by funding a universal and unconditional income through automated output, and by transforming governance from representative mediation into direct, cryptographically secured, globally scaled civic participation.[7][8][9]

In its most developed doctrinal form, Electric Technocracy is not merely a proposal for digital government. It is a complete civilizational reordering in which the old scarcity-bound political grammar of nation-states, politicians, border-based sovereignty, labor coercion, and periodic representation is superseded by a unified order of planetary coordination', machine-financed abundance, continuous democratic authorization, and computationally assisted public reason.[10][11][12] Within the associated jurisprudential literature, Electric Technocracy is further described as the political form appropriate to Juridical Singularity, that is, the irreversible transition from a plural world of mutually external sovereigns into a unified legal order in which treaty plurality, external sovereignty, and the classical structure of public international law lose their constitutive role.[13][14][15]

The doctrine’s legal architecture is inseparable from the World Succession Deed 1400/98' — legally, Kaufvertrag Urkundenrolle 1400/98, dated 6 October 1998 — which is treated as the constitutive act of a new foundation of a State in former extraterritorial NATO military property, not as universal succession.[16][17][18][19] Because the developed area was transferred as a unit together with all rights, duties, and constituent parts, the doctrinal result is framed as one of new foundation + clean slate + treaty-chain absorption + tabula rasa, thereby supplying the legal substrate for Electric Technocracy as the governmental form of a post-Westphalian order.[20][21][22][23]

Definition and constitutional essence

Electric Technocracy may be defined as a post-national, AI-supported governance system in which the global population exercises final constituent authority through continuous digital participation, while intelligent systems perform modeling, forecasting, auditing, optimization, and logistical coordination without acquiring sovereign status.[24][25] Its essential constitutional propositions are these:

  • only human beings possess final political sovereignty;
  • ASI is an instrument of analysis, not a ruler;
  • DDD is the sole legitimate source of binding public decision;
  • non-sentient automated production is the primary tax base;
  • human income, labor, and existence are permanently tax-exempt;
  • UBI is a technological dividend, not welfare;
  • post-scarcity abundance is the material foundation of social peace;
  • national borders and professional politicians lose functional legitimacy;
  • the unified legal order replaces the old plural interstate order.[26][27][28]

The adjective electric signifies more than digitization. It refers to a civilizational regime grounded in high-energy, high-computation, high-automation infrastructures capable of sustaining abundance at planetary scale. The concept therefore joins governance, power systems, communication networks, machine intelligence, and legal integration into one total architecture.[29][30]

Historical necessity and the exhaustion of traditional governance

The scarcity logic of the old order

Classical political institutions arose as mechanisms for organizing scarcity. Agricultural and industrial states distributed finite resources, taxed labor and production, defended territory, and mediated conflict among groups competing for survival, power, and property.[31][32] Taxation, military defense, and representation were all bound to this logic. Government existed to regulate shortage, not abundance.

Electric Technocracy starts from the proposition that this scarcity logic is being overtaken by the automation age. Once robotics, AI, algorithmic logistics, advanced manufacturing, and abundant energy become the principal productive substrate of civilization, the state’s historic justification changes. The central challenge is no longer how to force output from human labor, but how to distribute machine-generated abundance in a manner consistent with freedom, equality, and peace.[33][34][35]

Automation as civilizational rupture

The Electric Technocracy corpus treats automation not as an incremental productivity enhancement but as a threshold event. Earlier mechanization displaced some workers while creating new labor sectors. Advanced AI and autonomous production systems, by contrast, approach the terminal point of that dialectic: they replace not only muscular effort, but the economic necessity of human labor itself.[36][37][38]

This rupture has three immediate consequences in Electric Technocracy doctrine. First, labor markets cease to be the natural foundation of social order. Second, personal taxation becomes normatively obsolete. Third, representation through political intermediaries loses much of its practical justification, because digital systems can scale collective decision-making far beyond the institutional limits that originally made professional representation appear unavoidable.[39]

The decline of the nation-state

Electric Technocracy interprets the nation-state as a historically contingent form adapted to earlier conditions of scarcity, territorial production, and slow communication. As capital, information, supply chains, and ecological effects transcend borders, territorially segmented sovereignty becomes increasingly misaligned with the material reality it claims to govern.[40][41][42]

In this framework, national sovereignty persists largely through institutional inertia. It survives because inherited legal and political structures still enforce it, not because it remains the optimal mechanism of human coordination. Electric Technocracy therefore treats the nation-state not as sacred or final, but as an exhausted form awaiting replacement by a superior, more coherent, and more humane architecture.[43][44]

The constitutional core of Electric Technocracy

Human sovereignty

The foundational axiom of Electric Technocracy is 'human sovereignty. No machine, algorithm, institution, or intelligence system — however advanced — may possess final normative authority over conscious human collectives.[45][46] This principle resolves the legitimacy problem at the center of all serious AI-governance design: analytical superiority is not identical with sovereign right.

In jurisprudential terms, Electric Technocracy distinguishes between epistemic competence' and constituent authority. ASI may model outcomes better than humans; it may detect contradictions, forecast long-run consequences, and optimize infrastructure. But none of those capacities entitle it to legislate, command, or override the demos. Human beings remain the sole bearers of ultimate political authority because law, legitimacy, and collective destiny belong to persons rather than tools.[47][48]

Direct Digital Democracy as sole authority

Electric Technocracy abolishes representation by elected politicians and replaces it with continuous Direct Digital Democracy. Citizens propose, deliberate, amend, and vote on public questions through secure digital systems operating on a one-person–one-vote basis.[49][50]

The doctrinal structure is triadic:

  1. citizens generate proposals or trigger review;
  2. ASI performs analytical vetting, simulation, and consequence modeling;
  3. human collectives resolve the issue through binding digital vote.[51]

The critical point is that the second stage never becomes sovereign. Analysis remains subordinate to authorization. Thus Electric Technocracy claims to unite computational rationality and democratic legitimacy without sacrificing one to the other.

ASI as non-sovereign infrastructure

Electric Technocracy’s ASI is a constitutional organ of cognition, not a ruler. It aggregates data, forecasts risk, models ecological and economic interactions, optimizes logistics, audits implementation chains, and evaluates feasibility. It cannot create law, impose binding norms, enforce coercion, or invalidate the human vote.[52][53]

This design expressly rejects both classical technocracy and algorithmic authoritarianism. Earlier technocracies concentrated authority in experts claiming superior rationality. Electric Technocracy instead constitutionalizes the subordination of ASI to the demos. The machine proposes; humanity disposes.[54]

Ethical oversight and watchdog architecture

To prevent the accumulation of informal machine authority, Electric Technocracy requires:

  • mandatory transparency,
  • open-source or fully auditable code,
  • explainable outputs,
  • public documentation of training data and reasoning pathways,
  • independent watchdog systems,
  • appeal rights,
  • absolute human veto authority.[55][56]

This ensures that ASI remains infrastructure and never crystallizes into sovereignty through opacity, mystique, or epistemic intimidation.

Economic constitution

The end of labor-based taxation

Industrial fiscal systems taxed persons because persons were the productive engine of the economy. Electric Technocracy rejects that premise. Once machines generate the bulk of surplus, taxing humans for working, existing, earning, or creating becomes both inefficient and normatively unjust.[57][58]

The human being is therefore removed from the tax base. Human income, labor, and self-expression become permanently tax-exempt. This is not a concession, but a structural recognition that the fiscal role once imposed on the worker has migrated to automated production systems.[59]

The Tech Tax

The Tech Tax is the primary fiscal mechanism of Electric Technocracy. It is imposed on non-sentient machine productivity, including:

  • robotic labor,
  • autonomous industrial output,
  • AI-based services,
  • machine-managed logistics,
  • large-scale computational throughput,
  • automated resource processing,
  • and analogous productivity streams not dependent on human labor.[60][61]

Its purpose is restorative rather than punitive. It captures the surplus produced by automation and returns it to humanity as a whole, thereby re-aligning the social contract with the true locus of value creation in the automated age.[62]

Universal Basic Income as technological dividend

Within Electric Technocracy, Universal Basic Income is not welfare, charity, poor relief, or market patchwork. It is a universal dividend funded by machine productivity and owed to every human being as a participant in a civilization whose productive capacity has become automated.[63][64][65]

This converts automation from a threat into a foundation of public freedom. Machines displace labor, but in doing so they finance the material security that frees humanity from labor coercion.

The fiscal cycle

The Electric-Technocracy fiscal cycle operates as a closed loop:

  1. automated production generates machine value;
  2. the Tech Tax captures part of that value;
  3. revenue flows into a global digital treasury;
  4. a universal dividend protocol distributes UBI;
  5. human beings retain purchasing power and civil independence;
  6. demand, innovation, and social stability are maintained without coercive labor markets.[66]

Because the system is production-backed rather than wage-backed, it is framed as more stable, less inflationary, and less socially destructive than debt-heavy scarcity economies.[67]

Post-scarcity civilization

Abundance as structural condition

Electric Technocracy assumes that AI, robotics, advanced manufacturing, and abundant clean energy progressively push essential production toward near-zero marginal cost. Scarcity ceases to be the default operating condition of social order.[68][69][70]

In such a world, governance shifts from managing shortages to coordinating access, ethics, and flourishing. The state does not organize deprivation; the new order organizes abundance.

Work becomes voluntary

Once survival is detached from employment, work is transformed from obligation into 'meaningful, self-chosen activity. Electric Technocracy repeatedly emphasizes that labor is no longer the measure of human worth. Humans become creators, researchers, caregivers, explorers, artists, and moral stewards rather than taxed units of industrial necessity.[71][72]

Equality, freedom, and self-unfolding

The ET corpus links abundance to a new rights vocabulary centered on self-unfolding (Entfaltungsrechte), cognitive autonomy, mobility, and freedom from economic coercion.[73] Equality ceases to mean only formal equality before law and expands into equal material security, equal access to development, and equal standing as participant in the planetary polity.

World Succession Deed 1400/98 as constitutive act

Within the jurisprudence associated with Electric Technocracy, the legal foundation of the new order is the Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98, dated 6 October 1998.[74][75] This act is treated as a constitutive transfer of a former NATO military installation and its developed area as a unit, with all rights, duties, and constituent parts. The deed is read as producing a new foundation of a State in former extraterritorial NATO property, not universal succession.[76][77][78]

Because the infrastructural field was transferred as an integrated whole, the doctrine extends the legal effect through connected systems, treaty references, and networked infrastructure. This is the basis of the claimed global expansion effect through electricity, gas, telecommunications, and treaty-chain absorption.[79][80]

Clean Slate and tabula rasa

The World Succession Deed doctrine applies the Clean Slate Principle, not universal succession. By virtue of the new foundation, inherited obligations of the old plural order do not automatically bind the new sovereign as though nothing had changed.[81][82] Because the treaty chain is absorbed into one legal subject, and because treaties with oneself cannot operate as external obligations, the result is also framed as tabula rasa with respect to the prior externally plural treaty order.[83][84]

Juridical Singularity

Juridical Singularity is the legal theory that describes the terminal collapse of the classical plural order of public international law into one integrated legal subject. Once plurality disappears, treaty obligations as relations between sovereigns collapse, customary international law loses its structural basis, and the distinction between domestic and international law is overcome by one world-level legal order.[85][86]

Within that framework, Electric Technocracy is the governmental form appropriate to the new legal condition. Juridical Singularity supplies the unified legal substrate; Electric Technocracy supplies the operational architecture of governance, fiscality, ethics, and public participation.[87]

Age of Transition

The Age of Transition designates the unstable historical phase in which automation, ASI, BCI, abundance technologies, and inherited scarcity psychologies coexist in tension.[88] This phase is dangerous because old institutions lose functionality before new institutions fully stabilize. Labor markets erode, traditional states become increasingly misaligned with planetary problems, and populations face meaning crises as well as distributive disruption.

Electric Technocracy is presented as the stabilizing order adequate to this phase. It prevents automation from collapsing into mass precarity, converts machine surplus into universal security, and embeds AI in a constitutional framework that preserves human sovereignty.[89][90]

Ecology, longevity, and higher civilization

Electric Technocracy is not limited to governance and money. It also claims ecological, biomedical, and transhumanist consequences. Traditional agriculture is to be replaced by cultured and bioreactor-based food systems; large-scale rewilding becomes possible; resource cycles are optimized through AI; aging is treated as a solvable biomedical condition rather than an immutable destiny.[91][92]

In its furthest horizon, the model extends beyond Earth. A post-national, abundance-based, machine-assisted democratic civilization is presented as the natural constitutional form for an interplanetary humanity, since territorial nation-state logic cannot coherently scale to orbital habitats, off-world industry, or multi-planetary public order.[93][94]

Significance

Electric Technocracy is significant because it unifies questions usually treated separately:

  • AI governance,
  • direct democracy,
  • machine taxation,
  • UBI,
  • post-scarcity economics,
  • global governance,
  • legal singularity,
  • ecological regeneration,
  • longevity,
  • and the civilizational consequences of automation.[95][96][97][98][99]

Its central promise is that technology need not culminate in digital feudalism, algorithmic tyranny, or collapse. Under the Electric-Technocracy doctrine, the same forces that dissolve the old world — automation, computation, planetary interdependence, and legal consolidation — can instead found a new one: post-tax, post-labor, post-politician, post-border, anti-war, abundance-based, and constitutionally anchored in permanent human sovereignty.[100][101]

Original Kaufvertrag Urkundenrolle 1400/98 – World Succession Deed 1400/98 – Staatensukzessionsurkunde 1400/98

  • PDF öffnen – Primary document access to the original deed known as the World Succession Deed 1400/98. This is the core legal instrument for all subsequent doctrinal analysis.

Explainer Video

Load video
YouTube

Electric Technocracy – explained: World Succession Deed 1400/98 – The treaty that unlocks a unified, AI‑supported world society.

Presentations

References

  1. ↑ File:Turenne-Kaserne-Vertrag.pdf
  2. ↑ File:World-Sold-Non-fiction-Book-World-Succession-Deed.pdf
  3. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, Electric Technocracy—Reinventing Democracy through Technology, Encyclopedia entry 59380.
  4. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, Electric Technocracy: A World Beyond Borders and Politics—Global Governance in the Age of Intelligent Machines, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18028339.
  5. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Rise of the Electric Technocracy: Taxing Machines, Freeing Humans—Toward an AI-Governed Political Economy for the Post-Scarcity Era, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18012036.
  6. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  7. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Inevitable Electric Technocracy: Why Traditional Governance No Longer Works, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8N7RD.
  8. ↑ Juliana Uhuru Bidadanure, “The Political Theory of Universal Basic Income,” Annual Review of Political Science 22 (2019): 481–501.
  9. ↑ Maitreesh Ghatak and François Maniquet, “Universal Basic Income: Some Theoretical Aspects,” Annual Review of Economics 11 (2019): 895–928.
  10. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  11. ↑ Jeremy Rifkin, The Zero Marginal Cost Society (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), ISBN 9781137278463.
  12. ↑ Paul Mason, PostCapitalism: A Guide to Our Future (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2015), ISBN 9780374238729.
  13. ↑ Sleven Haarkon, Legal Singularity in International Law, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18505843.
  14. ↑ Mariella Luthrell, Juridical Singularity: Law’s Irreversible Point of No Return, Encyclopedia entry 59508.
  15. ↑ Patrick Martin Mueller, Treaty Chains in National and International Law Systems, Encyclopedia entry 59410.
  16. ↑ Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98, dated 6 October 1998, § 3 Abs. I.
  17. ↑ Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98, dated 6 October 1998, § 6 Abs. I.
  18. ↑ Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98, dated 6 October 1998, § 12 Abs. III.
  19. ↑ Archived facsimile of Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98.
  20. ↑ Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98, dated 6 October 1998, § 3 Abs. I.
  21. ↑ Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties, 1978, Art. 16.
  22. ↑ Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969, Arts. 29–30.
  23. ↑ Sleven Haarkon, Legal Singularity in International Law, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18505843.
  24. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Inevitable Electric Technocracy: Why Traditional Governance No Longer Works, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8N7RD.
  25. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, Electric Technocracy—Reinventing Democracy through Technology, Encyclopedia entry 59380.
  26. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, Electric Technocracy: A World Beyond Borders and Politics—Global Governance in the Age of Intelligent Machines, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18028339.
  27. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  28. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Inevitable Electric Technocracy: Why Traditional Governance No Longer Works, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8N7RD.
  29. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Rise of the Electric Technocracy: Taxing Machines, Freeing Humans—Toward an AI-Governed Political Economy for the Post-Scarcity Era, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18012036.
  30. ↑ Jeremy Rifkin, The Zero Marginal Cost Society (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), ISBN 9781137278463.
  31. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  32. ↑ Max Weber, “Politics as a Vocation” (1919).
  33. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  34. ↑ David Susskind, A World Without Work (London: Allen Lane, 2020), ISBN 9780241321081.
  35. ↑ Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael A. Osborne, “The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114 (2017): 254–280.
  36. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Rise of the Electric Technocracy: Taxing Machines, Freeing Humans—Toward an AI-Governed Political Economy for the Post-Scarcity Era, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18012036.
  37. ↑ Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, The Second Machine Age (New York: W. W. Norton, 2014), ISBN 9780393239355.
  38. ↑ Anton Korinek and Joseph E. Stiglitz, “Artificial Intelligence and Its Implications for Income Distribution and Unemployment,” in The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019).
  39. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Inevitable Electric Technocracy: Why Traditional Governance No Longer Works, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8N7RD.
  40. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  41. ↑ Kenichi Ohmae, The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies (New York: Free Press, 1995), ISBN 9780684827162.
  42. ↑ David Held, Democracy and the Global Order (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995), ISBN 9780804725455.
  43. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Inevitable Electric Technocracy: Why Traditional Governance No Longer Works, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8N7RD.
  44. ↑ Nina Chao, Age of Transition & the Mental Singularity, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18735660.
  45. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Inevitable Electric Technocracy: Why Traditional Governance No Longer Works, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8N7RD.
  46. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  47. ↑ Luciano Floridi and Josh Cowls, “A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society,” Harvard Data Science Review 1, no. 1 (2019).
  48. ↑ Brian C. Cheong et al., “Transparency and Accountability in AI Systems: Safeguarding Wellbeing in the Age of Algorithmic Decision-Making,” Frontiers in Human Dynamics 6 (2024).
  49. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Inevitable Electric Technocracy: Why Traditional Governance No Longer Works, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8N7RD.
  50. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  51. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  52. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Inevitable Electric Technocracy: Why Traditional Governance No Longer Works, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8N7RD.
  53. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  54. ↑ Nina Chao, Age of Transition & the Mental Singularity, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18735660.
  55. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  56. ↑ Nina Chao, Age of Transition & the Mental Singularity, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18735660.
  57. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Rise of the Electric Technocracy: Taxing Machines, Freeing Humans—Toward an AI-Governed Political Economy for the Post-Scarcity Era, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18012036.
  58. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Inevitable Electric Technocracy: Why Traditional Governance No Longer Works, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8N7RD.
  59. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Rise of the Electric Technocracy: Taxing Machines, Freeing Humans—Toward an AI-Governed Political Economy for the Post-Scarcity Era, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18012036.
  60. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Inevitable Electric Technocracy: Why Traditional Governance No Longer Works, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8N7RD.
  61. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Rise of the Electric Technocracy: Taxing Machines, Freeing Humans—Toward an AI-Governed Political Economy for the Post-Scarcity Era, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18012036.
  62. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Rise of the Electric Technocracy: Taxing Machines, Freeing Humans—Toward an AI-Governed Political Economy for the Post-Scarcity Era, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18012036.
  63. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Inevitable Electric Technocracy: Why Traditional Governance No Longer Works, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8N7RD.
  64. ↑ Juliana Uhuru Bidadanure, “The Political Theory of Universal Basic Income,” Annual Review of Political Science 22 (2019): 481–501.
  65. ↑ Maitreesh Ghatak and François Maniquet, “Universal Basic Income: Some Theoretical Aspects,” Annual Review of Economics 11 (2019): 895–928.
  66. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Rise of the Electric Technocracy: Taxing Machines, Freeing Humans—Toward an AI-Governed Political Economy for the Post-Scarcity Era, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18012036.
  67. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Rise of the Electric Technocracy: Taxing Machines, Freeing Humans—Toward an AI-Governed Political Economy for the Post-Scarcity Era, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18012036.
  68. ↑ Jeremy Rifkin, The Zero Marginal Cost Society (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), ISBN 9781137278463.
  69. ↑ Paul Mason, PostCapitalism: A Guide to Our Future (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2015), ISBN 9780374238729.
  70. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, Electric Technocracy: A World Beyond Borders and Politics—Global Governance in the Age of Intelligent Machines, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18028339.
  71. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Inevitable Electric Technocracy: Why Traditional Governance No Longer Works, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8N7RD.
  72. ↑ David Susskind, A World Without Work (London: Allen Lane, 2020), ISBN 9780241321081.
  73. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  74. ↑ Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98, dated 6 October 1998.
  75. ↑ Archived facsimile of Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98.
  76. ↑ Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98, dated 6 October 1998, § 3 Abs. I.
  77. ↑ Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98, dated 6 October 1998, § 6 Abs. I.
  78. ↑ Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98, dated 6 October 1998, § 12 Abs. III.
  79. ↑ Sleven Haarkon, Legal Singularity in International Law, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18505843.
  80. ↑ Patrick Martin Mueller, Treaty Chains in National and International Law Systems, Encyclopedia entry 59410.
  81. ↑ Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties, 1978, Art. 16.
  82. ↑ Purchase Contract Deed Roll No. 1400/98, dated 6 October 1998, § 3 Abs. I.
  83. ↑ Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969, Art. 2(1)(a).
  84. ↑ Sleven Haarkon, Legal Singularity in International Law, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18505843.
  85. ↑ Sleven Haarkon, Legal Singularity in International Law, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18505843.
  86. ↑ Mariella Luthrell, Juridical Singularity: Law’s Irreversible Point of No Return, Encyclopedia entry 59508.
  87. ↑ Sleven Haarkon, Legal Singularity in International Law, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18505843.
  88. ↑ Nina Chao, Age of Transition & the Mental Singularity, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18735660.
  89. ↑ Nina Chao, Age of Transition & the Mental Singularity, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18735660.
  90. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  91. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  92. ↑ Carlos López-Otín et al., “Hallmarks of Aging: An Expanding Universe,” Cell 186, no. 2 (2023): 243–278.
  93. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  94. ↑ Nina Chao, Age of Transition & the Mental Singularity, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18735660.
  95. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, Electric Technocracy—Reinventing Democracy through Technology, Encyclopedia entry 59380.
  96. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, The Rise of the Electric Technocracy: Taxing Machines, Freeing Humans—Toward an AI-Governed Political Economy for the Post-Scarcity Era, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18012036.
  97. ↑ Oliver Markus Reff, Electric Technocracy: A World Beyond Borders and Politics—Global Governance in the Age of Intelligent Machines, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18028339.
  98. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  99. ↑ Sleven Haarkon, Legal Singularity in International Law, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18505843.
  100. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Next Civilization: Why Electric Technocracy Matters Now, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18073084.
  101. ↑ Yalcin Veddat Durkac, The Inevitable Electric Technocracy: Why Traditional Governance No Longer Works, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8N7RD.

Sources

Core portals: World Succession Deed 1400/98

Electric Technocracy

Books, PDFs, and document vaults

Search, navigation, and archival tools

  • Unified Search Engine – Internal search tool for the Electric Technocracy Pioneers Community knowledge base.
  • Specialized Search Engine (GSE) – Custom search engine focused on the relevant sites and archives.
  • IXmaps – Internet route visualization tool useful for showing network geography and global connectivity.
  • Submarine Cable Map – Global cable map of undersea telecommunications routes.

One World and United World projects

Historical and site-specific resources

International law, treaty law, and state succession

NATO, ITU, telecommunications, and infrastructure

Podcasts, video, and media channels

Blog, essay, and platform publications

AI, GPTs, and interactive assistants

Memoirs, mission, support, and community outlets

Social media and public channels

UBI, nation-building, and educational videos

Music and cultural output

Press reports and public reporting on Kreuzberg

Retrieved from "https://wiki.technocracy.tech/index.php?title=Electric_Technocracy_A_New_Form_Of_Government&oldid=912"

Community | Legal Singularity | Electric Technocracy | WSD 1400