Jump to content

Infrastructure Succession vs. Land Succession: Revision history

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

22 May 2026

  • curprev 02:2202:22, 22 May 2026 DrInternationalLaw talk contribs 57,279 bytes −24 No edit summary
  • curprev 02:2202:22, 22 May 2026 DrInternationalLaw talk contribs 57,303 bytes +57,303 Created page with "{{Subtitle|Why Treaty Language on 'Unified Systems' Creates Spillover Risk}} ''Published: May 22, 2026 | Reading time: 18 minutes'' <blockquote> '''Key Takeaways:''' * The Vienna Convention on Succession of States (1978) treats infrastructure as secondary appurtenances to territory, but modern networked systems operate across multiple jurisdictions simultaneously, creating fundamental legal mismatches. * Subsea cables, cross-border pipelines, and military bases create..."